Early-pricing bonus — save up to 79% on your creditsSee pricing
DDevinvs.HHelio

Devin is a software engineer. Helio is a team.

Both put AI on real code, but they are scoped differently. Devin, from Cognition, is a dedicated engineer built for the heavy stuff: multi-repo migrations, PR review, incident triage. Helio covers coding as one job among several, alongside the inbox, the tickets, and the ops work a small team also has to keep up with.

What Devin is

Devin calls itself the AI software engineer, an autonomous coding agent that works inside the tools your team already uses: GitHub, Linear, Slack, Datadog. On a large project it can run several Devins in parallel across repos for weeks, and it learns your codebase as it goes.

The case

Triage a critical error and suggest a fix — the moment it fires

Devin's own Review product catches problems in every PR, which is the same instinct as the case below. Here the job also names a likely owner and drafts the fix, then keeps doing it on every future failure. Below is Helio doing the same job, owned — asked for once, then running on its own until you change it.

The real SOP this automation runs

  1. Pull the first stack trace and identify the impacted release/deploy.
  2. Check git blame on the failing path to find the most likely owner.
  3. Draft a short mitigation suggestion (rollback, flag-off, or hotfix pointer).
  4. Post a triage note in #community-support tagging the owner, with severity and suggested next step.

Now, the same job — live in Helio

That was live, not a screenshot. Point Helio at your own recurring work.

Where Helio goes a step further

  • A specialist who goes deep vs. a teammate who covers more ground. Helio's coding sessions work against your real repo, but coding is one job among several. The same workspace also runs the inbox and the ops work.

  • Copies of one engineer vs. owners of different jobs. Helio's teammates are split by job rather than cloned. One handles engineering, another support, another ops, and they hand work to each other.

  • One place for the code and everything around it. The same channels, the same task flow, and the same approval step cover the engineering teammate and the support teammate. You do not need a second tool for the work that is not code.

  • Team features are in the plan, not on top of it. Helio's tiers include team features. Devin's team features, like unlimited members and the admin dashboard, sit behind a separate Teams plan charged on top of its per-seat price.

Who each one actually fits

Use Devin when

  • · The work is deep and sustained engineering: large refactors, multi-repo migrations, review at scale.
  • · You want an agent that trains on your team's own past migrations and edge cases.

Use Helio when

  • · You want the code and the work around it handled in the same place.
  • · People outside engineering need to see what the AI did, without opening GitHub or Linear.

Sounds like your team? Helio is free to start — 1,000 credits, no card.

Pricing

Devin

Devin has a free tier, then Pro at $20/mo and Max at $200/mo. Teams is $80/mo plus $40/mo per full seat, with custom Enterprise pricing above that (devin.ai/pricing).

Helio

Helio runs on flat subscription tiers. Basic, Pro, Max, and Ultra range from $20 to $1,000 a month, with one-time credit boosters if you need more. Both are visible in-app under Settings → Billing.

Questions

Is Helio a Devin alternative?

For deep engineering work specifically, no. Devin's specialization goes further than Helio's coding sessions do today. Helio makes sense when the code is not the only thing that needs an owner, and you are willing to trade some engineering depth to stop being the one holding the inbox and the tickets too.

Every job gets an owner, not just the code.

See coding sessions sit next to the inbox, ops, and support teammates in the same workspace.

Devin facts sourced from devin.ai (homepage, pricing) — checked 2026-07-13.

Still weighing Helio and Devin?