Admin & Backend Builder
helio / admin-cms-builderDescribe who initiates, who approves, and where the data comes from and goes. Your AI team turns that into a real internal tool — modules, data model, and the sync jobs that keep it honest.
Build an internal tool for our procurement flow: a buyer submits a contract, a manager approves it, and every approved contract should sync into a supplier payment plan. The data lives in our approval tool and our ERP. Ask me what you need before you start.
Swap in your own process, approvers, and the two systems that need to stay in sync.
What is Admin & Backend Builder?
A teammate that turns a described process, who initiates, who approves, and where data moves, into a working internal tool: flow diagram, data model, module breakdown, and acceptance tests written before the build. It keeps two systems in sync on a schedule and flags mismatches for a human to resolve, rather than picking a winner itself.
What it does
Any chatbot sketches a schema once. Helio runs it as a standing job — from your context, kept current, delivered to you.
| Owns the job, not just the schema | It runs the data model past a technical lead and only calls the tool done once the acceptance tests pass. |
| Runs again without starting over | Once the sync works, it's saved and re-runs daily against newly approved records, with no manual re-entry. |
| Works from your context | It builds against your Database, GitHub, and the ERP's real data shape. |
| Keeps itself current | When the process or approval chain changes, it updates the flow and schema. You don't re-explain the workflow. |
| Lands where you work | Synced records and mismatch flags arrive in Slack, Lark, or email. You don't open Helio to check. |
Three things it gets right
Acceptance tests before the build
Concrete pass/fail cases are written before the first line ships, not reverse-engineered after.
Flags mismatches, never reconciles silently
When source and target records disagree, it reports the conflict and lets a human decide which system is right.
Built against your real ERP shape
The sync job is written against your ERP's actual data shape, so it fits the systems you already run.
Questions
- Does it design the database schema itself?
- Yes — from the process description, it proposes a data model and module breakdown, which a technical lead reviews before implementation starts.
- What happens if the two systems disagree?
- Mismatches are reported, never silently resolved. A human decides which system is right before anything gets overwritten.
- Can it connect to our existing ERP?
- It connects to what you already run — the sync job is built against your ERP or approval tool's actual data shape, not a generic template.
- Who reviews the acceptance tests before launch?
- A dedicated review pass checks every acceptance case and exception path before anything goes live — this isn't a ship-and-hope process.
Turn your process into a working tool.
Describe who initiates, who approves, and where the data lives — Helio scopes the modules and keeps the systems in sync.
Ask about this automation